Template talk:Whatsnew
"Wrong order"?
That's the way I've been doing it the whole time I've been here; newest day of seven on top, add new items to the bottom of their day, use whichever of the images from the first articles of the day is best*
*mostly based on whim
- Quolnok 03:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- I thought it was the newest goes on top and uses that picture. I sometimes use the "Other New Articles" page. — Chris
of
the
Futurama
2 [ discuss | contribute ] 04:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Strictly speaking there's no rule on where in the section it goes or which of the images to use, so long as the articles all go up, there's an image from the most recent day (if one exists**) and there's only seven days there. - Quolnok 05:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- **otherwise keep the old one. - Quolnok 11:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Can anyone shed some light on this? — Chris
of
the
Futurama
2 [ discuss | contribute ] 22:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Uh, did I not just do that? The whim based system has worked for three years. So long as everything is put in the right day (based on the person who is adding it to the template's timezone), there are seven days and a recent, related image is there. - Quolnok 00:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Alrighty, then. — Chris of the Futurama 2 [ discuss | contribute ] 01:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Uh, did I not just do that? The whim based system has worked for three years. So long as everything is put in the right day (based on the person who is adding it to the template's timezone), there are seven days and a recent, related image is there. - Quolnok 00:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Can anyone shed some light on this? — Chris
of
the
Futurama
2 [ discuss | contribute ] 22:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- **otherwise keep the old one. - Quolnok 11:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Strictly speaking there's no rule on where in the section it goes or which of the images to use, so long as the articles all go up, there's an image from the most recent day (if one exists**) and there's only seven days there. - Quolnok 05:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
New proposed format
I propose the following format in accordance with new main page proposal (based on its current content):
6-article hard limit (with dates)
- 17 November
- Technology: Radiator
- Place: Jolly Junction
- 15 November
- Technology: Cryogenic Freezing Chamber
- 11 November
- Item: Giant Diamond
- 10 November
- Catchphrase: Me, Bender
- 9 November
- Location: Nutley
10-article hard limit (without dates)
- Technology: Radiator
- Place: Jolly Junction
- Technology: Cryogenic Freezing Chamber
- Item: Giant Diamond
- Catchphrase: Me, Bender
- Location: Nutley
- Item: Diamond-Filament Tether
- Items: Nixon $300 Bill
- Merchandise: Futurama Posters and Giclees
- Place: Decapodian Embassy
Shorter date hard limit
17 November
- Technology: Radiator
- Place: Jolly Junction
15 November
- Technology: Cryogenic Freezing Chamber
11 November
- Item: Giant Diamond
10 November
- Catchphrase: Me, Bender
Which one is best? Or got an alternative version? --Svip 18:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- i'm happy with the 10 article hard limit. --I'm Scruffy... the Janitor. 20:38, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Go with the ten I think, the dates make us look kind of inactive anyway. - Quolnok 12:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)